Western Australia imposes 900‑km commercial fishing ban, prompting veteran anglers’ protest
A 21‑month ban on demersal fishing from Kalbarri to Augusta has been criticised by long‑time fishers who say they were not consulted and that the measure threatens their livelihoods.

A 21‑month ban on demersal fishing from Kalbarri to Augusta has been criticised by long‑time fishers who say they were not consulted and that the measure threatens their livelihoods.
The story
The Western Australian government announced a 21‑month prohibition on commercial fishing for demersal species along a 900‑kilometre stretch of coastline, covering the area from Kalbarri in the north to Augusta in the south‑west. The ban, which took effect on 1 January, targets species such as pink snapper, red emperor and dhufish, which officials say have experienced severe declines in spawning populations.
State authorities justified the sweeping restriction as the only viable option to protect the threatened stocks and to allow the fish populations to recover. They indicated that without such measures, the long‑term sustainability of the fishery could be compromised.
Several commercial and recreational fishing groups have voiced opposition to the ban, arguing that they were not adequately consulted before the decision was made. At a recent hearing, participants highlighted concerns about the communication of the policy and its economic impact on coastal communities that depend on fishing for income.
A closer look
Nick Soulos, a former shark fisherman with 58 years of experience in the region, told reporters that the ban has devastated his way of life. He noted that he has worked under multiple fisheries ministers and directors and participated in numerous advisory committees, yet feels the government has not fully grasped the consequences for fishers. Soulos said the community had proposed an alternative plan involving a 50 percent reduction in fishing effort and seasonal restrictions in spawning areas, but that proposal was not adopted.
The dispute underscores a broader tension between conservation objectives and the economic realities of coastal livelihoods. While the government maintains that the ban is essential for the recovery of key species, affected fishers continue to seek a more collaborative approach that balances ecological goals with the sustainability of their industry.
This report presents the named publisher’s account and has not yet been independently corroborated.


