Proposed Perimeter Fence at Katherine Courthouse Raises Safety Concerns for Domestic Violence Services
Court officials plan to install a perimeter fence at the Katherine Courthouse to prevent vandalism, prompting safety concerns from legal and domestic violence advocates.

Court officials plan to install a perimeter fence at the Katherine Courthouse to prevent vandalism, prompting safety concerns from legal and domestic violence advocates.
The story
Court officials are planning to construct a perimeter fence around the Katherine Courthouse in the Northern Territory to prevent windows from being smashed after hours. The proposed project also involves removing a large rain tree in the front garden because it has reportedly dropped sizeable branches.
According to a letter sent to court users by NT Local Court principal registrar Sarah Hannon, the security measure is required due to previous incidents involving damaged windows and doors. Ms Hannon stated that planners want to avoid an imposing appearance, proposing a simple looped, pool-style fence instead of spiked or overt security features.
Unlike major courthouses in Darwin and Alice Springs that extend directly to the footpath, the Katherine facility features a shaded outdoor space with seating. This area has functioned as a waiting zone for witnesses, victims, accused individuals, and families, as well as a meeting space for lawyers and clients and a place for families to grieve during coronial inquests.
A closer look
The registrar's letter noted that gates would remain open during operating hours to allow free movement. However, the proposal has faced strong criticism from the Katherine Women's Information and Legal Service.
Domestic violence services warn that the structure could restrict movement and potentially trap women alongside accused abusers during high-stress situations at the facility. In response to the concerns raised, the Northern Territory Attorney-General's Department stated that design work is ongoing and community feedback regarding movement restrictions is being evaluated.
This report presents the named publisher’s account and has not yet been independently corroborated.

