Cross-Examination Continues for Accused Former Officer Over Double Homicide Claims
The former police officer on trial for the murders of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies faces ongoing prosecution questioning regarding his version of events.

The former police officer on trial for the murders of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies faces ongoing prosecution questioning regarding his version of events.
The story
The legal proceedings for accused double-murderer Beau Lamarre-Condon continued with ongoing cross-examination by the prosecution in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The 31-year-old former senior constable has pleaded not guilty to the February 2024 murders of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies, maintaining that the two men were shot with his police pistol in self-defence.
Crown prosecutor Brett Hatfield SC commenced his questioning by examining the circumstances surrounding Lamarre-Condon's arrival at Mr Baird's house. The prosecution questioned why the accused did not believe anyone was present inside the residence despite arriving heavily disguised. Crown allegations suggest that Lamarre-Condon staked out the Paddington terrace for several hours on the morning of February 19, 2024, waiting until only his former partner remained inside.
During his evidence-in-chief, Lamarre-Condon disputed the Crown's timeline, telling the court he believed the house was empty when he entered to retrieve personal belongings, including expensive shirts and a Cartier ring. He testified that he searched the premises wearing an Uber Eats driver outfit and a motorbike helmet, which was subsequently tendered as a trial exhibit.
A closer look
When questioned by Mr Hatfield regarding whether he lifted his helmet visor while inside the property, Lamarre-Condon maintained his account. According to the accused's testimony, the failure to lift the visor contributed to a case of mistaken identity, during which he claimed Mr Baird lunged at him with a knife under the belief that an intruder had entered the home.
The cross-examination follows a teary recount provided by Lamarre-Condon at the end of the previous week, where he detailed the fatal shootings. The trial examines the conflicting accounts presented by the defence and the prosecution regarding the motivations and events of the February 2024 incident.
This report presents the named publisher’s account and has not yet been independently corroborated.


