California Voters Defeat Ballot Proposal for One-Time Billionaire Wealth Tax
Proposition 40, which sought a 5 percent levy on residents with net worth exceeding $1 billion to backfill federal healthcare funding cuts, failed after a heavily funded opposition campaign.

Proposition 40, which sought a 5 percent levy on residents with net worth exceeding $1 billion to backfill federal healthcare funding cuts, failed after a heavily funded opposition campaign.
The story
California voters have rejected a proposed ballot measure that would have levied a one-time 5 percent tax on the net worth of billionaires residing in the state. The Associated Press determined that the "no" vote had prevailed following a week-long count of ballots from the midterm elections.
Known as Proposition 40, the measure targeted individuals with a wealth of more than $1 billion, aiming to raise approximately $100 billion. Proponents intended for the majority of the revenue to backfill federal healthcare funding reductions, with smaller portions designated for education and food-assistance programs. Supporters argued the tax was necessary to maintain state programs and ensure that ultra-wealthy residents contributed to public budgets.
The initiative drew fierce opposition from business leaders, technology executives, and several Democratic figures, including outgoing California Governor Gavin Newsom. Opponents argued that the levy would prompt wealthy residents and high-tech entrepreneurs to leave the state, thereby harming the state budget, which relies heavily on income taxes from its highest earners. Some traditional Democratic allies, such as Planned Parenthood and the California Medical Association, also joined the coalition against the measure due to concerns over budget stability.
Campaign spending heavily favored the opposing side.
Campaign spending heavily favored the opposing side. A political action committee opposing Proposition 40 raised more than $333 million, with Google co-founder Sergey Brin contributing over $100 million. In contrast, the "Yes on 40" campaign was outspent roughly ten to one. Proponents, including SEIU United Healthcare Workers West president Dave Regan, contended that the heavy spending created confusion among voters, while union leaders pledged to pursue similar tax proposals in future election cycles.
The measure served as a prominent test for progressive tax policies targeting investment wealth rather than traditional income. While national figures such as U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders campaigned in favor of the initiative, voters split along demographic lines, with younger voters showing higher support than older demographics and higher-income households leaning toward opposition.
Read the source reports and compare their framing:


