NewNWS newsroom live
◌Local weatherLocating…--°
Wednesday 28 October 202600:00:00AEDT · Sydney
NewNWSThe Global DeskThe world, in sharper focus.
Live wire
Australia · Global desk · Full report

Victorian Court of Appeal to rule on Erin Patterson murder convictions

The three‑judge panel will deliver its judgment on Friday, determining whether the life sentence and convictions for the 2023 mushroom poisoning case will stand.

By Sanjay Suresh · Published · 3 min read
File:United States Supreme Court Building at night.jpg
Illustrative subject photograph: File:United States Supreme Court Building at night.jpg (2020-08-28). Not a photograph of the newly reported event. Photo: APK · CC BY-SA 4.0 View licence and source ↗ · Usage terms ↗
The brief

The three‑judge panel will deliver its judgment on Friday, determining whether the life sentence and convictions for the 2023 mushroom poisoning case will stand.

The Victorian Court of Appeal is scheduled to hand down its decision at 10 a.m.

The Victorian Court of Appeal is scheduled to hand down its decision at 10 a.m. AEDT on Friday regarding the convictions and sentence of Erin Patterson, who was found guilty in 2025 of murdering three relatives and attempting to murder a fourth after serving a beef Wellington laced with death‑cap mushrooms at her Leongatha home in July 2023.

Patterson, 52, has maintained her innocence and appealed on the grounds that there were irregularities in the jury sequestration process, errors by the trial judge, and what she described as an unfair cross‑examination by prosecutors. The appeal seeks to overturn both the convictions and the life sentence that includes a non‑parole period of 33 years.

If the appeal is successful, the Court of Appeal could order a retrial or acquit Patterson entirely. A loss would leave her with limited legal avenues, as the conviction would remain in place and the life sentence would continue to apply.

A closer look

Separately, Victoria’s Director of Public Prosecutions, Brendan Kissane KC, is pursuing a Crown appeal against the sentence, arguing that the 33‑year non‑parole period is "manifestly inadequate" given the seriousness of the offences. The Crown’s appeal could result in a longer non‑parole term or a different sentencing structure.

The case has attracted extensive media coverage since the poisoning incident, which resulted in the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, while Ian Wilkinson survived after weeks of hospitalization.


Sources compared

Read the source reports and compare their framing: